在这个具有全球竞争激烈的时代,每个人都想刺激创新思维在他或她的组织中,以实现增长和盈利能力。创新显然是竞争优势的主要来源。
But innovation has ethereal and elusive characteristics and cannot be “managed.” Managers miss the point when they try to set aggressive improvement goals. What they achieve is incremental improvements in areas such as time-to-market, development cost, product cost and quality. Those have value—but they are not the disruptive shifts that bring significant change, explosive growth and real leadership.
Looking back, the last major innovation in industrial automation was the distributed control system (DCS), which generated major growth for Honeywell in the mid-’70s. Around the same timeframe, after decades of relay-based controls, Dick Morley invented the innovative programmable logic controller (PLC), which generated industry leadership for Modicon (now Schneider Electric) and Allen-Bradley (now Rockwell Automation). More than three decades later, the PLC is still in use and generating billions in revenue.
After those innovations, very little really new has emerged from industrial automation. Wonderware, Intellution and other personal computer software developers quickly saturated human-machine interface (HMI) markets, morphing DCS into networked PCs and PLCs, but with no significant disruptive growth. When will the next automation innovations arrive to energize the automation business?
Take a look behind the hullabaloo of recent “major” announcements in industrial wireless products. The rapid deployment of commercial wireless technology indicates clearly that the need for wireless communications in factory and process environments is immediate and urgent. Instead of announcing a new break-through that will set the competition on its ear and energize the industry, the leaders feature different flavors of the same ingredients. The true spirit of innovation is missing.
Meanwhile, innovative small companies are already generating growth and success with wireless products. I can picture their sales people making the rounds to the unimaginative hierarchy of all the industrial automation majors, trying hard to develop volume through partnership arrangements. And after the long-winded song-and-dance, with a lot of posturing, the larger companies start to introduce over-priced, under-performing offerings at prices that are too high to stimulate penetration. Beyond that, the focus—time and money—goes on developing standards like ISA S100, from the Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, which will drag on for years. Committees don’t promote innovation; by the time any standards gain consensus, technology will already have moved on.
我愿意打赌,如果以突破性的价格迅速推出了高级和创新的无线产品,将席卷工业自动化市场;最终用户会吞噬它们,而无需等待“标准”的制定。它可能会引发破坏性增长,从而重新激发工业自动化。
Shifting center-of-gravity
在全球舞台上,创新并不是源于所谓的发达国家,它正在迅速在全球范围内传播。许多国家都将大量资金和努力投入到高等教育上,这会培养受过教育的工人,即创新的关键。像爱尔兰这样的小国已经从相对落后的地位迅速出现到巨大的繁荣。像印度和中国这样的较大国家正在开始淘汰破坏性产品。
More than ever, America’s prosperity depends on its ability to remain the global innovation leader. On balance today, America is still the world’s premier producer of high tech and growth services. Extrapolating those trends will be part of the challenge.
Jim Pinto是行业分析师和评论员,writer, technology futurist and angel investor. You can e-mail him at:jim@jimpinto.com.Or review his prognostications and predictions on his Web site:www.jimpinto.com